http://news.aol.com/story/_a/fed-up-...04210409990001
Ok, there are two sides in this story. On the one hand, I totally understand where this guy is coming from. If he's trying to promote peace, then why fund the war. But all I can agree with is his viewpoint. I TOTALLY disagree with him, for many reasons, but I will name a few.
First off, any one person can't have total say over what their taxes are used for. They can influence it, like, uh...voting? I didn't like the D.A.R.E. program..ok, rephrase-I did like the idea behind it. But it was costing too much money and not helping nearly enough people. Everyone voted and the program was shut down.
I don't think the government is going to suffer enough by just a handful of its people not paying taxes. (I'm sure there aren't many out there willing to not pay taxes and risk a federal offense.) And on that note-not paying taxes is just going to make everyone else suffer. I doubt the reduction in taxes is going to come out of government officials' salaries, or the war...it will come out of government supported programs, that involve education or healthcare or the like. Things that benefit the average citizen. Its like this-three kids want to go to the Zoo. One child acts up, makes the mom mad, and then no one gets to go.
And my last thought on this (sorry this is so long) is that this will not promote peace in the long run. Sometimes peace protestors don't think things out. No taxes=no money=weak government=war=chaos. We need to change the government, not bring it down.
Either that, or this guy could just like, uh...MOVE? If he hates his country that much, move somewhere else. Or better yet-ship him off to Afghanistan for a few months and then see how much he loves his country.
