_community   discussion-forums

Families Discussion Forums

Reply
 
Thread Tools    Search this Thread    Display Modes   
  #1  
Old 03-24-2007, 09:27 PM
karabu's Avatar
karabu
Family Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
Default Legenth of labor for second and later babies?

My doctor said that generally for each baby - labor takes half as long. So if my labor was 18 hours with my first, it would be around 9 hours for my second.
I realise this is more of a guideline than a hard and fast rule, but I wondered how true it was.
For anyone who has had more than one baby - how did the legenth of labor compare?
__________________
Visit Karabu's Patchwork Creations for fun, handmade stuff for babies and kids! http://karabu.etsy.com

Freelance writers - list articles for sale, and set your own price! http://www.constant-content.com/?aref=2320
  #2  
Old 03-24-2007, 10:15 PM
QueenAngie's Avatar
QueenAngie
Sr. Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,356
Honestly, each labor & delivery is different.

I do not think that my 2nd L&D was 1/2 the time of my 1st L&D.

One would think that the 2nd delivery would be shortened.....
but each one is different.

One of my friend's told me her #3 was the worst.

My Mom had 9 live births, so with the above doctor's theory, they should have gone:
20 hours,
10 hours,
5 hours,
2.5 hours,
1.25 hours,
0.75 hours,.......
but each one was a long labor for my Mom.

I would not be worrying about the time frame at this point.

What will be, will be.....

I do not think you can control the length of the labor, unless you go for a c-section.

((Hugs))

Don't worry about the length of time. Focus on a healthy Mom & healthy Baby.
__________________
Photobucket


Hello from Central Illinois, USA!
30th Wedding Anniv on 5/23/11.
Blessed w/ 2 sons: age 24 & 21.
My Sweet Mom passed 8/25/09
and my dear Dad passed 6/26/10 -
both are now in Heaven & holding hands!

Last edited by QueenAngie : 03-25-2007 at 06:12 PM.
  #3  
Old 03-24-2007, 10:22 PM
angelic_ky's Avatar
angelic_ky
Family Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,446
Send a message via MSN to angelic_ky
my aunt had 5... the first she went over 24 hrs and then they c-section; the next 3 were 30+ hrs (last was another c-section, but before labour)... she did say they were shorter each 1 (36, 33 & 31 hrs, i think it was; something like that anyway)
__________________





  #4  
Old 03-24-2007, 11:33 PM
kimchee67's Avatar
kimchee67
Family Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,830
Send a message via Yahoo to kimchee67
Sounds good to me! My 5 hours of active labor seemed to fly by, so I wouldn't mind one that was only 2.5!

Honestly though, I've heard that the first is usually faster, but not sure by how much or how true that is.
__________________
-Christina-

  #5  
Old 04-23-2007, 08:25 AM
LeanyBean's Avatar
LeanyBean
Family Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,446
My first was 18 1/2 hours, my second was 16 hours and my 3rd was 8 1/2 hours ending in an emergency c-section.

1st: woke at 4:30 a.m. having contractions, went to hospital around 2 p.m., was stuck at 4 cm for hours and hours, finally about 9:45 I was at 9 and at 10:37 pm Noah Reilley arrived

2nd: Went to bed around midnight, rolled over at 12:30 when I felt a warm trickle down my leg, got up and left a small stream from my bed to the bathroom, walked for a few hours-nothing, got pitocin to induce labor, I steadiluy progressed throughout the day and at 4:34 after about half hour of pushing Ridley Thomas arrived.

3rd: Had mild, infrequent contractions all morning, went my regular appointment, had membranes stripped and labor started on the way home, contractions came quicker and harder very quickly. I was 3 cm at my appointment at 2 pm and when I got back to teh hospital at 6 I couldn't walk more than 2 steps without bringing on another contraction, first checked and I was at 7 cm, 15 mnutes later I was checked again and this time I was at 10 cm and my water broke all over the nurse. 2 1/2 hours of puching later we all decided it was best for me and baby for a c-section. At 10:36 p.m. Charles Elyas Daniel was born.

I guess your doc's theory was more of a guideline for them to follow.
If I would have followed it my labors would have been 18, and 9 and 4 1/2 hours which would leave just about 2 1/2 hours for a 4th. A 4th most likely would be a scheduled c-section for me because it would more than likely be a last baby and I would have tubes tied at the same time.

All labors and deliveries are different.
__________________



  #6  
Old 04-23-2007, 10:46 AM
pattiewrites's Avatar
pattiewrites
Senior Blogger
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,262
My first labor was 21 hours. When I was pregnant with my second, the doctor said it would probably take half as long. Well, it took 23 hours.
__________________

Visit the Yoga Blog!
  #7  
Old 04-23-2007, 02:23 PM
twinzplus3's Avatar
twinzplus3
Managing Editor
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,809
My first labor was 9 hours, my 2nd was 36 hours, my 3rd was 4 hours and the twins were about 3 hours. My 2nd was in a posterior position which is why he was longer.
__________________



Come visit my blogs!
  #8  
Old 04-23-2007, 02:39 PM
mollymae's Avatar
mollymae
Community Director
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,250
Send a message via MSN to mollymae
First one 14 hours - posterior presention - natural onset
second 12 hours - induced and augmented - cord round neck
third 12 hours - induced and augmented - shoulder distoxia cord twice round shoulders
4th breech/unstable lie - section
5th tranverse with a knot in cord - section
__________________

  #9  
Old 04-23-2007, 02:39 PM
mollymae's Avatar
mollymae
Community Director
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,250
Send a message via MSN to mollymae
First one 14 hours - posterior presention - natural onset
second 12 hours - induced and augmented - cord round neck
third 12 hours - induced and augmented - shoulder distoxia cord twice round shoulders
4th breech/unstable lie - section
5th tranverse with a knot in cord - section
__________________

  #10  
Old 04-27-2007, 10:22 PM
riveneuphoria
Family Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 12
My labor for my first child was probably 36 hours. He was face up instead of face down, so he kind of got stuck. Plus I had an epidural and wasnt able to push as hard as I needed to. With baby 2 (just born 1 week and 2 days ago) I was in labor maybe 3 hours. I woke up with contractions and wasnt even sure if thats what I was having. With baby 1 I knew it was time because my water broke. Baby 2 I waited an hour before not being able to take anymore and telling Hubby we needed to go. By the time I got to the hospital the contractions were 2 minutes apart. By the time someone came off the elevator to take me to the maternity department they were about 45 seconds apart. And by the time I was in an exam room they were 30 seconds. They got me into a labor room after torture in the exam room. I was already all the way dilated. Labor went so fast I didnt get an epidural. 57 minutes after arriving to the hospital, Jacob was born. It all went very quickly.

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe | Blog For Us! | Be a Moderator! | Advertise with Us | Help
[x]close