_community   discussion-forums

Families Discussion Forums

View Poll Results: Did you circumcise your son?
Yes 13 68.42%
No 6 31.58%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools    Search this Thread    Display Modes   
  #1  
Old 12-21-2008, 06:06 AM
craftymama
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8
Default Moms of boys- re: circumcision

Please help me make this choice. What did you do and why? We are not really sure what to do. DH is not and we are leaning towards not doing it. It seems like the majority do though.
  #2  
Old 12-21-2008, 06:43 AM
2girls's Avatar
2girls
Family Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,119
We did, for hygiene and these health reasons.
A circumcision can protect against UTI's, STD's like HIV and syphilis. It also can protect against cancer like penile and prostate.
Also in women circumcision of the male partner provides substantial protection from cervical cancer and chlamydia.
  #3  
Old 12-21-2008, 07:14 AM
mcmama's Avatar
mcmama
Family Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,837
No, but I wish we had. Makes things a lot easier for them later, particularly if they have trouble stretching the foreskin.

And you don't want to do this later.

  #4  
Old 12-21-2008, 07:24 AM
Samual
Departed
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,472
Do not do it, what the above poster says about benefits is a myth, you are more likely to get an UTI if you have your foreskin removed as under the foreskin the body produces antibodies and white blood cells to prevent infection,where as without the foreskin the entrance to the urethra is completely dry and easy for bacteria to enter. Hygiene reasons is rubbish as well as when you circumsize a boy you have to clean under the small remaining piece of skin, if you leave the foreksin in place there is nothing to clean under as the foreksin is fused to the ***** until the early onset of puberty. Removing the foreksin lowers the levels of testosterone, which means erection and fertility problems are more likely in those lacking in the genitals.
There is not one reason why circumsision is ever beneficial unless there is actually something wrong with the childs foreskin.
It offers no protection against STD's what so ever, it does not protect women against STD's as they are passed on in the semen not from the general head area of the *****, STD's such as chlamydia are more easily caught in a circumsized male, then a male with a full *****.. The foreskin makes up half of the skin of the *****, hence why cut men are often smaller and can suffer very painful erections
They tie your baby down and literally rip their foreksin off with no anesthetic.

I'm naturally half circumsised as my foreskin didn't develop properly, I constantly have UTI's which have damaged by bladder and kidney, there is virtually no sensation until you get to the area where I do have foreskin, because it is half and is much like what you get with a circumsision it is very hard to clean and impossible to be perfectly clean because the foreskin cannot expell any dirt, like it would if it was fully formed. Because it means the end of the ***** is skin instead of membrane you have to be very careful otherwise you get urine burn.

Yet my father, my brother, my husband and our sons have never had any of these problems and they all have foreskins!

http://www.nocircpa.org/4642.html
Some factual information.
  #5  
Old 12-21-2008, 07:37 AM
mcmama's Avatar
mcmama
Family Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,837
The "tie the baby down" part was what put me off. And my ex was against circumcision.

With one son we had no problems, but with the other there were problems - not so much infection, but a risk of the opening being blocked - skin was very stiff. You can work this out with creams, but the kid has to take responsibility to do it.

BTW, the autocensor kicks in on discussions of the male organ, because we have had difficulty with this word attracting the wrong sort of member after they run a google search for it.
  #6  
Old 12-21-2008, 11:22 AM
QueenAngie's Avatar
QueenAngie
Sr. Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,026
Depends on your religion, culture, geographical location, choice, and lifestyle.

We are for male pro-circ in our family.
__________________
Photobucket


Hello from Central Illinois, USA!
We are Peanut Butter & Jelly =
Sandwich Generation.
28th Wedding Anniv in 2009.
Blessed w/ 2 sons: age 23 & 20 in college & my elderly father 87, our 'older kid.'
  #7  
Old 12-21-2008, 12:09 PM
wanttobemommy's Avatar
wanttobemommy
Sr. Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,580
Send a message via MSN to wanttobemommy Send a message via Yahoo to wanttobemommy
it is something that is very family specific. Jaxon was because he daddy is and to us it is the norm. But it is what ever is best for your family
__________________
Photobucket
Lilypie 2nd Birthday Ticker
pregnancy
  #8  
Old 12-21-2008, 01:35 PM
dlr
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 112
We did, because DH is. We have friends who didn't because he wasn't. I'm sure that baby is "tied down" because it is not a procedure were the baby is put under. Isn't a woman "tied down" when she has a c-section? It's just to prevent the baby from moving, it's not cruel if you ask me. Also, as far as I know the dr is required to give baby pain relief, DS was given pain relief and has no adverse affects from having it done. Health pros/cons I haven't heard one was or the other, other than the dr saying it doesn't affect cancer, or STD either way. The hospital we had in done at, dr said 9 out of 10 have it done. I think around here it's "normal", but I feel it's a personal choice. I know they don't in many countries because of the government health insurance.
__________________






  #9  
Old 12-21-2008, 01:42 PM
Samual
Departed
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,472
The only pain relief they give the boy is a drop of sugar water on his lips, they are tied down because they scream in pain and try to move away from the doctor ripping them apart. I've seen it done it is the most barbaric thing I have ever witnessed in my life, how its legal I have no idea. Nevermind someone paying another person to do this to their child, my mum used to threaten us with this as kids because here its renound to be one of the most horrific things you can have done.

In the UK around 1% of the population are circumsized, the majority being for actual medical reasons, but that number is still falling as we realise how wrong it is.
  #10  
Old 12-21-2008, 02:37 PM
dlr
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 112
From what I was told, DS received a shot to numb the area. He was back in the room shortly and was not screaming in pain, nor did it seem to bother him later in the day. That's the way it went for us anyway.
__________________







Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Signup for our free community and join the conversation with 450,554 registered users active members!
Username
Password
Email
Birth Date
Gender Female Male
Agree to terms of use.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe | Blog For Us! | Be a Moderator! | Advertise with Us | Help