_community   discussion-forums

Families Discussion Forums

Reply
 
Thread Tools    Search this Thread    Display Modes   
  #1  
Old 04-24-2008, 01:39 PM
JMSPGH
Family Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 286
Default Vbac

I'm going to try for a VBAC for this delivery. However, I just came back from my well visit with my VBAC consent form and I'm scared to death. My doctor says that I'm an ideal candidate for a VBAC since it wasn't due to a failed attempt. I'm sure they are just trying to cover their bases with all the things I have to initial and sign. I may have even signed the same for my C-section, but was all drugged up & didn't really care what I was signing.
__________________
Lilypie 1st Birthday Ticker

Lilypie 5th Birthday Ticker
  #2  
Old 04-24-2008, 06:13 PM
LeanyBean's Avatar
LeanyBean
Family Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,396
I think you'll be just fine. I was told I was a great candidate for a vbac as well but I didn't fill out any paperwork because I was opting for a repeat section. Turns out I was indeed a great candidate because I ended up having a vbac without medication. Only needed 2 stitches and no additional pain meds until after I had my tubal ligation done the day after delivery.
Just keep in mind that your body knows what it is doing and that you'll be just fine and so will your new babe.
__________________





  #3  
Old 04-24-2008, 06:50 PM
pattiewrites's Avatar
pattiewrites
Senior Blogger
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,261
You probably did sign a similar form for your c section. I know I didn't read the papers they handed me with my c section. The consent form for the epidural is pretty scary too, if you read it. Just realize that the risk is really pretty small with VBAC, particularly if you are a good candidate for it. Here are some vbac blogs I've written.
http://pregnancy.families.com/blog/a...idate-for-vbac
http://pregnancy.families.com/blog/p...-vbac-delivery
http://pregnancy.families.com/blog/w...-vbac-delivery
__________________

Visit the Yoga Blog!

  #4  
Old 04-25-2008, 03:26 AM
twinzplus3's Avatar
twinzplus3
Managing Editor
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,807
A VBAC in a good candidate is always less risky than a c-section. If you look purely at numbers, the chances of something going wrong during a c-section are substantially higher than with a vbac.
__________________



Come visit my blogs!
  #5  
Old 04-25-2008, 05:59 AM
JMSPGH
Family Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 286
I think the items that are scaring me are referring back to the risk of rupture which they say is around 1%. So basically if that happens all sorts of things can go wrong. I guess I never thought of the idea that my baby could get hurt or die during birth.
__________________
Lilypie 1st Birthday Ticker

Lilypie 5th Birthday Ticker
  #6  
Old 04-25-2008, 06:19 AM
twinzplus3's Avatar
twinzplus3
Managing Editor
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,807
Okay forgive me for getting on my soap box. Birth is "risky"--whether you deliver vaginally or via c-section. Women die from it, have hystorectomies from it etc. This notion that a c-section is safer than a vaginal delivery is from I don't know where but it's plainly wrong and it irritates me to no end because I feel like what's communicated to women is quite the opposite. It sounds like you have a good ob that's not encouraging you to do an unnecessary c/s. . .and frankly I feel that any doctor who would encourage women to have an unnecessary c-section is irresponsible, unethical, and should at the very least have his medical license investigated. That's not what happens--I know. But don't look at the 1%--look at the whole picture.

*The CDC says you are 3x more likely to die or the baby is more likely to die because of a c-section.

*1 in 2,500 women dies during a c-sectin compared with 1 in 10,000 during vaginal births--that includes VBAC births btw. So if death is your concern, you are far more likely to die during a c-section than a vaginal delivery.

Don't misunderstand me, c-sections are wonderful and lifesaving under the right circumstances. But you should never feel like it's a safer option--it's not. I nearly died from my c/s. Twin 'b' was a footling breech with the cord wrapped around her neck--so I knew that unless she'd turn during labor I would probably have a c/s. I still chose to birth twin 'a' vaginally both bc it's less risky for a baby to be vaginally born, plus there was the off chance that 'b' would turn. 'B' did not turn--I had the c/s and nearly died. The doctor said it was a miracle I didn't and he credits in part my decision to birth one twin vaginally for that. He thinks that if they had had to get two babies out instead of just the one--my darling spouse would be a widower.

Something that women need to realize is that risk is relative. I don't mean to make you afraid of having a c/s either bc if that's what you need--then that's what you need. But it is no how, no way safer in and of itself. If you're worried about risk of death to you or your baby, risk of historectomy--you are far safer delivering vaginally so saith the statistics. (Sorry so long!)
__________________



Come visit my blogs!
  #7  
Old 04-25-2008, 06:43 AM
mollymae's Avatar
mollymae
Forums Manager
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,147
Send a message via MSN to mollymae
Also to add you don't have to be having a VBAC to rupture. It's a possibility in a normal labour to. There is a slight increase in it happening during a vbac but they will monitor you and the baby constantly.
__________________


Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Signup for our free community and join the conversation with 449,822 registered users active members!
Username
Password
Email
Birth Date
Gender Female Male
Agree to terms of use.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe | Blog For Us! | Be a Moderator! | Advertise with Us | Help