I did have a VBAC after my c-section, but not really by choice. My first delivery was an emergency c-section as the baby was facing the wrong way and stuck. With my second pregnancy, my doctor preferred doing a c-section, but when I went into labor, I barely made it to the hospital and almost had him in the hallway (no medication, no nothing, thank you very much!)
With my third pregnancy, my new OB also preferred a c-section over a vbac, even though I had already had a sucessful one. The reason why was because every time you have a contraction, it puts pressure on your uterus. When that pressure happens, it can cause tearing where the original incision was made. If that tears, one of two things can happen: they can do an emergency c-section which might require an up and down incision instead of a bikini incision, depending on how fast they have to get in there and how much scar tissue you alredy have, or your uterus can rupture which could be deadly to you and the baby. My doctor told me that unless I could guarantee a speedy delivery like with my second one, she wasn't willing to take the chance, as they had just had a woman at the hospital who had 3 successful VBACS who had her uterus rupture and the baby died.
So, I'm not trying to scare you, many, many women do VBACS and are fine. I was one of them. But, listen to your doctor and follow his advice. He knows you, your condition and your body better than any of us do.
Originally Posted by Right_Writer
Hi. I had a c-section with twins in November 2002. I'm wondering if anyone has had a VBAC after a multiples pregnancy with a c-section. The next time around I'd like to have a VBAC as opposed to the difficult recovery from the c-section. But is there more risk to the mom and the baby? Just curious.
Thanks,
Karen